Hello,
where may I find more informations regarding ldg-beta and ldg-tau in the literature? Could you point to a good reference to study them?
Best regards
Hello,
where may I find more informations regarding ldg-beta and ldg-tau in the literature? Could you point to a good reference to study them?
Best regards
See Eq (25) and (27) in:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010465514002549
along with the references therein.
Regards, Freddie.
Thanks a lot for the answer, very grateful
Best regards
Hi @fdw,
is there any relationship in terms of accuracy of the computed solution if the values are not 0.5 and 0.1 respectively? E.g. ldg-tau = 1,2 … or ldg-beta any other value in [-1, 1]?
Best regards
The differences are typically minor. Taking ldg-beta
to be \pm 0.5 does have slight performance advantages hence it is the default.
Regards, Freddie.
To my understanding for ldc-beta ± 0.5 is because of upwind/downwind biasing with a compact stencil (am I right?) but what about tau? Is any value “reasonable” with minor deteriorations even large ones like 1.0, 2.0 etc…?
Best regards
The performance benefit comes from the fact that when beta is \pm 1/2 that you only need gradients from one side of the interface. This reduces the amount of work that the common interface flux code has to perform.
Larger values of ldg-tau
may introduce excessive dissipation and there is not usually a benefit to using anything outside the range of zero to one.
Regards, Freddie.