# pyFR on hybrid meshes

**URL:** <https://pyfr.discourse.group/t/pyfr-on-hybrid-meshes/39>\
**Category:** General\
**Created:** [14 July 2014 09:24 UTC](https://pyfr.discourse.group/t/pyfr-on-hybrid-meshes/39 "2014-07-14T09:24:42Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Antonio\_Garcia-Uceda](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/ce73a5/32.png) [@Antonio\_Garcia-Uceda](https://pyfr.discourse.group/u/Antonio_Garcia-Uceda)\
**Post date:** [14 July 2014 09:24 UTC](https://pyfr.discourse.group/t/pyfr-on-hybrid-meshes/39/1 "2014-07-14T09:24:42Z")

</div>

Dear all,

My name is Antonio Garcia-Uceda, and I’m working on implementing a FR algorithm for hybrid meshes, composed of Hexas, Tetras, Prism, and Pyrams.

I’m interested particularly on how to choose best solution points, as well as constructing a suitable nodal basis, for every element shape.

Could you please provide me with those references/material you used to devise your FR method for hybrid meshes? Many thanks.

Best regards,  
Antonio

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![p.vincent](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/pyfr.discourse.group/p.vincent/32/225_2.png) [@p.vincent](https://pyfr.discourse.group/u/p.vincent)\
**Post date:** [23 July 2014 10:46 UTC](https://pyfr.discourse.group/t/pyfr-on-hybrid-meshes/39/2 "2014-07-23T10:46:18Z")

</div>

Hi Antonio,

In terms of solution point location I would suggest the following:

Triangles

[http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10915-014-9832-2](http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10915-014-9832-2)

Tetrahedra

[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377042714000211](http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377042714000211)

Quads and Hexes

Probably best to use a tensor product of GL points.

Cheers

Peter